Journal of Advanced Biomedical Sciences
JABS
Sun, Dec 22, 2024
[Archive]
Volume 3, Issue 2 (9-2013)
JABS 2013, 3(2): 111-116 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Zamiri H K, Noroozi M, Moradi S, Shabani M, Sharifi A, Haghbin M A. Evaluation of intra ocular pressure and hemodynamic change following intubation with Maccoy, Macintosh and Video laryngoscope. JABS 2013; 3 (2) :111-116
URL: http://jabs.fums.ac.ir/article-1-107-en.html
URL: http://jabs.fums.ac.ir/article-1-107-en.html
Hamid Khosro Zamiri 
, Mehrdad Noroozi , Siavash Moradi , Mohammad Shabani * 1, Ali Sharifi , Mohammad Ali Haghbin
, Mehrdad Noroozi , Siavash Moradi , Mohammad Shabani * 1, Ali Sharifi , Mohammad Ali Haghbin
1- , shabanimoh@yahoo.com
Abstract: (15338 Views)
Background & Objective: The induction of anesthesia, laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation can be associated with adverse hemodynamic response and increased intraocular pressure. The aim of this study was to evaluate intraocular pressure and hemodynamic changes after laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation with three methods of laryngoscopy (Macintosh, Maccoy and Video laryngoscope).
Materials & Methods: One hundred and eighty patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification of I and II, aged 20-70 year, were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial (RCT). Anesthesia was induced by administration of Propofol 2 mg/kg, Fentanyl 1µg/kg and Cisatracurium 0.1mg/kg. the Hemodynamic information of the patients and intraocular pressures were documented and assessed in three stages (after induction of anesthesia and endotracheal intubation, and 5 minutes after endotracheal intubation using Maccoy, Macintosh and Video laryngoscope).
Results: Hemodynamic parameters' of patients increased in these three groups compared with those of pre anesthesia measures, but this increase was not significant. Evaluation of intraocular pressure (IOP) in Video laryngoscope group showed that there is a significant drop in intraocular pressure (IOP) compared with other groups. There weren’t any significant differences of IOP after intubation in Maccoy compared to the Macintosh group. Nevertheless there was not any significant difference in IOP, before and five minutes after intubation in these groups.
Conclusion: According to a low degree of augment of IOP in Video laryngoscope group and no changes in the Hemodynamic parameters, it seems that the use of Video laryngoscope in eye surgeries might be more suitable for endotracheal intubation.
Materials & Methods: One hundred and eighty patients with American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification of I and II, aged 20-70 year, were enrolled in a randomized clinical trial (RCT). Anesthesia was induced by administration of Propofol 2 mg/kg, Fentanyl 1µg/kg and Cisatracurium 0.1mg/kg. the Hemodynamic information of the patients and intraocular pressures were documented and assessed in three stages (after induction of anesthesia and endotracheal intubation, and 5 minutes after endotracheal intubation using Maccoy, Macintosh and Video laryngoscope).
Results: Hemodynamic parameters' of patients increased in these three groups compared with those of pre anesthesia measures, but this increase was not significant. Evaluation of intraocular pressure (IOP) in Video laryngoscope group showed that there is a significant drop in intraocular pressure (IOP) compared with other groups. There weren’t any significant differences of IOP after intubation in Maccoy compared to the Macintosh group. Nevertheless there was not any significant difference in IOP, before and five minutes after intubation in these groups.
Conclusion: According to a low degree of augment of IOP in Video laryngoscope group and no changes in the Hemodynamic parameters, it seems that the use of Video laryngoscope in eye surgeries might be more suitable for endotracheal intubation.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
anesthesiology
Received: 2013/02/17 | Accepted: 2013/10/6 | Published: 2013/10/6
Received: 2013/02/17 | Accepted: 2013/10/6 | Published: 2013/10/6
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons — Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0)